Tim Cumper wishes to alert you to a new project.
It’s called – Tim Cumper Me.
Here is an extract from the very first posting – much more to come – covering such fascinating topics as famous Filipino’s and their (not-so-famous) living relatives.
But more of that later.
“On this page I am going to illustrate the sort of behaviour indulged in by Jepoy (John Phillips Bengero) – demonstrating his callous, frivolous, contemptuous attitude – and his compulsion to incite his friends and colleagues by constantly publishing material surrounding my name.”
Lushly illustrated with photographs used as part of a “competition” – how low can contempt and disrespect go?
Find out – head along to the new blog.
Catch you later.
Tim Cumper invites you all to read the journal, written day by day, during July 2007 – on a romantic visit to the Philippines.
The photo-journal describes an adventure in tropical climes – with a new-found love – how plans were made for divorce, emigration, marriage & a family – and how things turned decidedly sour on his return to the UK.
Read all about it here – Tim Cumper – Hospital Scams.
There are a host of other blogs connected to this story – a group of bloggers in the Philippines (completely unconnected to the initial events) took it upon themselves to organise a Search Engine Optimisation campaign (SEO) – to bury the story in the Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs.)
They are still at it – now five years after the original adventure started.
Tim Cumper says –
An absurd situation becomes more so.
Back in May of this year I managed to get a video removed from YouTube via a DMCA complaint (copyright) – a very poor copy of the video extract I had published online of the fateful web-cam transmission of the girl showing me her scar – was soon published by Jepoy on YouTube – a frame by frame copy in low quality – aimed at discrediting the evidence visible in the original video uploaded by myself.
Patently an infringement of copyright.
However, the law allows for an appeal to be made against the removal of material – by way of a counter-notification.
As you will read, the only way to unhinge this counter-notification, resulting in a permanent removal of material – is through official/expensive/legal channels.
I begrudge the payment of a single cent towards an interminable situation – in which there is not the slightest willingness being shown for arbitration or negotiation – only complete and stubborn silence – apart from appearances of notices like these which prove that these people are still very much “on the case” and still hard at work.
So – my reply to YouTube reads –
If the people responsible for issuing this counter-notification respected the simple courtesy of replying to my emails & messages – containing my wishes & suggestions for negotiation & resolution – then this whole issue, requiring costly action, could have been avoided.
However – through the clemency of the law on this matter – it appears to serve in favour of these people’s determined aim – to cause me distress & discomfort – in any way that they can.
The forcing of this particular issue to surface again (material originally removed in May of this year) – at this moment in time is connected to an ongoing campaign of defamation & hatred – being conducted by these people for the last 4 years – the same campaign that was also responsible for the original infringement of copyright.
It is also clear that the statement made by the complainant in his counter-notification – is knowingly false – in that his “good-faith belief that the material was removed due to a mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.” – is patently and transparently a dishonest confession – and that the claimant is usurping the authority of this official statement to hide his own deceit.
He is thus perverting the course of justice and the law by issuing false declarations – the proof of their falseness being revealed by the claimant’s own admission accompanying his publishing of the alleged copyright material :-
a) In the title “Tim Cumper’s Evidence”
b) The accompanying description of where this material was originally being displayed by myself – when it was copied by these same people for their own use.
Thus, there is no possible “mistake or misidentification” – and the truth of the matter is being denied.
Their action represents no more than a flippant disrespect of legal process – as an opportunity to cause me further discomfort – by forcing this issue down a route where there is only expensive litigation action ahead, should I choose to pursue the matter further.
I do appreciate that YouTube can only arbitrate, silently, within the existing parameters of law – but may I strongly claim, that even these parameters of process are being trashed by the patently dishonest use by the complainants in this case.
Yours most sincerely,
In response to a comment left on FaceBook regarding the employment of “Fair Use” as a defense by the counter-claimant – I responded as follows.
“Under normal circumstances, especially on the Internet, yes, “fair use” is often the hand that reinstates material, or saves it from being removed. However, in this particular instance – the material containing “visual evidence” – the quality of the material itself is strongly influential as to a viewer’s perception.
Thus – the publishing of a poor quality copy – in which the subtlety of evidential value is lost – in an effort to hoodwink a viewer into regarding this material as original – is of a profound significance, not fully comprehended by the simple use of “Fair Use” as a justification.”
Tim Cumper says – “Hi Netizens – intrepid Internet readers – devoted advocates of honesty, transparency & fair-play.”
What can one interpret from an obstinate silence?
What is the tacit message, automatically assumed, by a refusal to communicate?
Exactly – the answers are easy to read – GUILT – DEFENSIVENESS – RUDENESS – CONTEMPT – SHAME.
So here we have John Phillips Bengero, Reyna Elena & Noemi Lardizabal-Dado – perfectly providing us with their own character assessment – done simply – by their own actions.
Little else, beyond this, can be implied.
Tim Cumper adds – “So here are the perfunctory additions of Genuine links to my web-presence – avoiding the foul material being constantly sludged out by the above collaborating persons.”
Describing Tim Cumper’s continuing battle against a perfectly rude & obstinate silence.
The gaming group – who like to play games – on the Internet – using the search engines as their battle-ground – childish, facile, flippant and contemptuous.
Sporting the name of Noemi Dado’s web-hosting/domain registration business – which is responsible (no doubt with her personal endorsement) of registering the domain name “timcumper.com” – for the continuation of her spurious activity.
Queen of the poisoned pen – highly involved in both the original and current SEO campaigns of hatred – against Tim Cumper.